| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones 07:49 - Mar 12 with 2640 views | QJumpingJack |
It was pleasing that this got addressed last night at the forum.
Watson claims it was a coincidence that he sat next to him at Bournemouth away (FA Cup).
A slightly odd comment "it won't happen again" if they are indeed friends from their time at Luton.
Some further questions for the club.
Bournemouth away - who was he a guest of? Bournemouth? Swansea?
The seating plan suggests he may have been a guest of Swansea. If yes - why?
Another question for the club:
Was this the first time Jones had been in a directors box at a Swans game this season?
People connected to the club claim he was at the Cardiff away game in the directors box - in defence of Jones - he may have been a guest of Cardiff but the club should be able to confirm.
Coleman sat next to Watson last night so Andy will know what the truth is.
And perhaps the most important issue is that while Jones is invited as a guest of Swansea then it could undermine the manager in the dugout. |  | | |  |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 10:06 - Mar 15 with 497 views | jackrmee |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 09:59 - Mar 15 by vetchonian |
Paul Watson |
Oh yeah, of course haha.
So what was he meant to have done with Martin? |  |
| |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 17:52 - Mar 15 with 404 views | swan_si |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 10:11 - Mar 14 by QJumpingJack |
the audience laughed at his answer.
Why didn't he admit that it was no coincidence.
It just erodes any trust that was left.
and it is probably not the first time they sat next to each other this season. [Post edited 14 Mar 10:13]
|
"The audience laughed at his answer " No. Some of the audience laughed, mainly the giggling nasal speaking part of the audience. The ones with running noses. |  | | |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 18:06 - Mar 15 with 389 views | Whiterockin |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 17:52 - Mar 15 by swan_si |
"The audience laughed at his answer " No. Some of the audience laughed, mainly the giggling nasal speaking part of the audience. The ones with running noses. |
It seems to me that some of the majority who are not happy with the current ownership went. Those who are happy and could have gone to support the owners couldn't be bothered.
Did you go and voice your thoughts? |  |
| |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 18:10 - Mar 15 with 383 views | swan_si |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 18:06 - Mar 15 by Whiterockin |
It seems to me that some of the majority who are not happy with the current ownership went. Those who are happy and could have gone to support the owners couldn't be bothered.
Did you go and voice your thoughts? |
No. Unfortunately I couldn't go. How about you? | | | |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 18:16 - Mar 15 with 361 views | Whiterockin |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 18:10 - Mar 15 by swan_si |
No. Unfortunately I couldn't go. How about you? |
No, I had no intention of going because I know they wouldn't answer the questions that matter. There is a reason they won't answer and it will come out sooner or later. | |
| |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 18:25 - Mar 15 with 344 views | swan_si |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 18:16 - Mar 15 by Whiterockin |
No, I had no intention of going because I know they wouldn't answer the questions that matter. There is a reason they won't answer and it will come out sooner or later. |
How would you know they wouldn't answer your questions beforehand? 🤷♂️ | | | |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 18:31 - Mar 15 with 332 views | Whiterockin |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 18:25 - Mar 15 by swan_si |
How would you know they wouldn't answer your questions beforehand? 🤷♂️ |
Some things you just know and I was proved correct. | |
| |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 18:34 - Mar 15 with 326 views | swan_si |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 18:31 - Mar 15 by Whiterockin |
Some things you just know and I was proved correct. |
I watched/listened to both YouTube videos, I didn't notice any questions go unanswered. 🤔 | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 21:01 - Mar 15 with 247 views | QJumpingJack |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 18:34 - Mar 15 by swan_si |
I watched/listened to both YouTube videos, I didn't notice any questions go unanswered. 🤔 |
go back and watch it.
certain panelists did not answer the questions they were asked. | | | |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 21:39 - Mar 15 with 219 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 21:01 - Mar 15 by QJumpingJack |
go back and watch it.
certain panelists did not answer the questions they were asked. |
Some of the questioning did not deserve a reply. Pure ignorance at times. The compere warned the audiance once for silly name calling. |  |
| Wise sage since Toshack era |
| |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 21:54 - Mar 15 with 203 views | swan_si |
| Paul Watson and Nathan Jones on 21:01 - Mar 15 by QJumpingJack |
go back and watch it.
certain panelists did not answer the questions they were asked. |
I watched both numerous times and apart from the embarrassing tittering, and the Watson gate questions, I found nothing wrong with them, I don't intend doing it again. Maybe you could time line the unanswered questions. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
